Geography 423
Advanced Geomorphology

The role and nature of time in geomorphology


  1. time-dependent (developmental or relaxation-time models)
  2. time-independent (characteristic-form models)

With the emergence of equilibrium concepts, the historical significance of a time-dependent view, and the development of isotope techniques for establishing the absolute age of sediments and thereby surfaces, time is a subject of ongoing interest and research with four recurring themes:

1. Classification and sampling of time

Schumm, S.A. and R.W. Lichty. 1965. Time, space and causality in geomorphology. American Journal of Science, 263: 110-119.

The subdivision of time according to whether variables of landscape evolution are independent, semi-dependent or dependent:


sampling of time


2. Magnitude and frequency


Wolman, M.G. & W.P Miller. 1960. Magnitude and frequency of forces in geomorphic processes. Journal of Geology, 68: 54-74.

Wolman and Miller determined that at least 50% of sediment transport was by flows of a magnitude that occurred at least once per year, that is, that events of intermediate magnitude and frequency generally dominate fluvial sediment transport. This benchmark analysis sparked much further consideration of magnitude and frequency including elaboration of the concepts and recognition of its limitations and complexities:

  1. the common calculation of recurrence intervals for meteorological and hydrological events is useful but the geomorphic significance of these events also depends on other controls (i.e. vegetation, soil, morphology and rock)
  2. frequency and magnitude assume stationarity of the series, that the mean and variance do not vary over time (basically equivalent to substantive uniformitarianism), however trend, persistence and intermittency in the behaviour of geomorphic systems makes the frequency distribution an incomplete description of a sequence of geomorphic events
  3. extremely rare events (e.g., once in half a million years or an annual probability of 10-5) may have tremendous geomorphic consequences as postulated by neocatastrophists (e.g. draining of glacial Lake Missoula creating the eastern Washington scablands)
  4. there is a fundamental difference between the processes of quasi-continuous sediment transport and the processes that create landforms in terms of magnitude/ frequency characteristics
  5. just as magnitude and frequency relationships differ between transport and formative processes, they also differ for various parts of a landscape, particularly between stream channels and interfluves, and over larger areas between regional climates (note: the original magnitude/ frequency work was based in humid temperate climates)
  6. for the above reasons, comparisons of the effectiveness of various geomorphic processes are increasingly based, not on magnitude and frequency, but on more uniform measures of erosion such as mass of sediment moved or amounts of geomorphic work

3. Change through time

Brunsden, D. and thornes, J.B. 1979. Landscape sensitivity and change. Transactions, Institute of British Geographers, 4: 463-484.

reaction and relaxation

hysteresis

4. Entropy and equilibrium


However geomorphic systems are also subject to order imposed by structural (geologic) control and to repeated and variable inputs, suggesting various kinds of equilibrium:

  1. static
  2. stable
  3. unstable
  4. metastable
  5. steady state
  6. thermodynamic
  7. dynamic
  8. dynamic metastable

related equilibrium concepts

  1. feedback
  2. threshold
  3. "a tendency toward equilibrium"
  4. complex response

[ Course Outline | Next Topic ]